Intercultural perspectives on information literacy and Metaliteracy (IPILM)

IPILM is a learning environment that promotes collaborative knowledge construction among students from diverse cultural backgrounds. Educators and learners from various countries take part in an intercultural learning endeavor.

Page 2 of 9

AI and Access, e.g. Education, Job Market

Landingpage for conference session on the IPILM blog: 7th IPILM-Conference

AI-generated with chatgpt

Quick facts and insights

Role of AI
  • AI broadens access via adaptive tutoring, predictive analytics, and multilingual support (Yeo & Lansford, 2025).
  • ITS (Intelligent Tutoring Systems) demonstrate measurable improvements in learning outcomes in diverse contexts (Holmes et al., 2019).
  • UNESCO (2024) stresses AI’s potential in low‑resource environments when supported by policy.
What are important questions?
  • What is AI’s role in improving access to education for diverse learners?
  • How does AI help in personalised learning, and why is it important for inclusive education?
  • In what ways is AI transforming the job market and creating new opportunities?
  • What skills do learners need to stay relevant in an AI-driven job environment?
  • How can AI support equal access to job information and career guidance?

Summary of the topic

This blog examined the role of artificial intelligence in improving access to education and its broader implications for the job market. A key focus was on how AI can support inclusive education through personalized learning, intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive feedback, and multilingual support, thereby addressing diverse learning needs. At the same time, the presentation critically discussed structural and ethical challenges, including algorithmic bias, data protection and privacy risks, limited transparency of AI systems, and generally low levels of AI literacy among users. In addition, the presentation highlighted global inequalities in access to AI, emphasizing that countries with stronger digital infrastructure and higher AI preparedness benefit more from AI adoption, while others risk being left behind. Two empirical case studies were used to support these points: one analyzing teachers’ trust in AI in education across different countries, and another examining the impact of generative AI on employment, skill requirements, and labor market inequalities. Overall, this emphasized that AI offers significant opportunities, but only if implemented responsibly, ethically, and with equal access in mind.

AI-generated with chatgpt

Aktivieren Sie JavaScript um das Video zu sehen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6d_0PB0Pbg
The video shows why job losses are occurring in some areas, which professions are particularly affected, and which skills will be crucial in the future. It also discusses how to strategically develop in your current job, the continuing role of education, and why building a strong personal positioning is becoming increasingly important in the age of AI. Finally, a clearly structured three-step approach is presented for remaining professionally relevant in the long term.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6d_0PB0Pbg

🟢Advantages of AI in Education

(UNESCO, 2024), (Yeo & Lansford, 2025), (Holmes et al., 2019)

Healthcare

AI simulations allow students to practise surgeries and diagnoses safely.

Predictive models help students understand real-world medical decision-making.

Multilingual virtual assistants support global medical learners.

Finance

AI financial modelling tools prepare students for real-market scenarios.

Risk-assessment simulations improve practical decision-making skills.

Adaptive learning helps students strengthen weak conceptual areas.

Education

Personalised learning using reinforcement-learning models.

ITS improves learning outcomes across diverse learners.

AI improves accessibility for learners with disabilities through speech-to-text, translation, etc

Aktivieren Sie JavaScript um das Video zu sehen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJP5GqnTrNo
Al Khan, founder of Khan Academy, is convinced that artificial intelligence can greatly improve the education system. He shows how AI can support students through personalized learning assistance and teachers through digital assistance systems, and introduces new features of the educational chatbot Khanmigo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJP5GqnTrNo

🔴Disadvantages of AI in Education

(Marín et al., 2025), (Sahar & Munawaroh, 2025), (Al-Zahrani & Alasmari, 2024)

Healthcare

In the healthcare sector, bias, data protection issues, and a lack of transparency can lead to incorrect or unfair AI decisions, while a lack of human contact and low AI literacy further complicate care.

Finance

In the financial sector, bias, data protection risks, and non-transparent AI models have a significant impact on fairness and trust, especially when professionals lack AI expertise.

Education

In education, the disadvantages of AI mainly concern academic integrity, data protection, algorithmic fairness, lack of human support, and generally low AI literacy.


Key findings from two relevant case studies

Case Study 1 Job Market
Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work.
(Cazzaniga et al. 2024)
  • Highly skilled jobs are most affected by AI, but also benefit the most (increased productivity, better wages).
  • Low-skilled and older workers are at greatest risk of being disadvantaged by AI.
  • Women and knowledge workers are particularly exposed to AI.
  • AI can exacerbate inequalities, especially in countries with poor digital preparedness.
  • The US/UK are well prepared, emerging markets less so, resulting in large global differences.
Case Study 2 Education
What Explains Teachers’ Trust in AI in Education Across Six Countries?“(Viberg et al., 2025)
  • Perceived benefits ↑ → Trust ↑; Concerns ↑ → Trust ↓. These two were the strongest predictors of trust.
  • AI self-efficacy & AI understanding strongly increased perceived benefits and reduced concerns — indirectly boosting trust.
  • Demographics (age, gender, education) did not significantly influence trust.
  • Cultural values mattered: High uncertainty avoidance, collectivism, and masculinity were associated with differences in trust and concerns.
  • Cross-country variation: Brazil, Israel, and Japan showed higher trust; Norway, Sweden, and USA showed lower trust after adjustments.

Watch our Screencast here🔽

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FHxBVBWicE


📖References

Click here for references
  • Al-Zahrani, A.M., Alasmari, T.M. (2024): Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: The dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11, 912 https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4.
  • Cazzaniga et al. (2024): “Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work.” IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN2024/001, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400262548.006 .
  • Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019): Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AIED-Book-Excerpt-CCR.pdf .
  • Marín, Y. R., Caro, O. C., Rituay, A. M. C., Llanos, K. A. G., Perez, D. T., Bardales, E. S., Tuesta, J. N. A. & Santos, R. C. (2025): Ethical Challenges Associated with the Use of Artificial Intelligence in University Education. Journal Of Academic Ethics, 23(4), 2443–2467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09660-w .
  • Sahar, R. & Munawaroh, M. (2025): Artificial intelligence in higher education with bibliometric and content analysis for future research agenda. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01086-z .
  • UNESCO. (2024): AI and inclusive education: Policy guidance for promoting equity. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350 .
  • Viberg, O., Cukurova, M., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Alexandron, G., Shirai, S., Kanemune, S., Wasson, B., Tømte, C., Spikol, D., Milrad, M., Coelho, R. & Kizilcec, R. F. (2025): What Explains Teachers’ Trust in AI in Education Across Six Countries? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35, 1288–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00433-x.
  • Yeo, G. & Lansford, J. E. (2025): Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Educational Functioning: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10085-5 .

Conference evaluation

Dear students, instructors and visitors,

thank you for taking part in the 7th Conference on “Intercultural Perspectives on Information Literacy and Metaliteracy”.

As mentioned, we created a survey to gather your opinions and thoughts on the conference. It’s completely anonymous and takes about 3-5 Minutes. We’d ask you to participate so we can improve future conferences that meet your expectations and interests: https://survey.academiccloud.de/index.php/919939?lang=en

– Your IPILM Team

Keynote on IPILM Conference 2025

We’re happy to announce Dr. Nicola Marae Allain as our keynote speaker on the 7th onlince conference on “Intercultural perspectives on information literacy and meta literacy” who will talk about

Mindful Metaliteracy in the Age of Generative AI: Attention, Reflection, and Human Agency

Abstract
Generative AI is reshaping how we create, interpret, and communicate knowledge, making reflective judgment and intentional meaning-making more essential than ever. This keynote explores how a metaliterate emphasis on metacognition, authorship, and ethical participation aligns with Ellen Langer’s scholarly work on mindfulness as active, context-sensitive awareness and orientation to learning. Drawing briefly on a classical story from the Zhuangzi on the relationship between mind and machine, the talk highlights how learners can approach AI-generated texts and imagery with greater attention, flexibility, and creative autonomy. The SUNY FACT2 AI Guides and evaluation instrument and Allain and Mackey’s forthcoming book on AI and Metaliteracy are introduced as practical tools for supporting ethical and intentional adoption. Through examples from visual research and interdisciplinary practice, the session demonstrates how mindful metaliteracy can cultivate more thoughtful, creative, and human-centered engagement with generative AI.

You can find the whole presentation here.


Dr. Nicola Marae Allain

Dr. Nicola Marae Allain is Professor of Arts and Media at SUNY Empire State University and co-editor of AI and Metaliteracy: Empowering Learners for the Generative Revolution (Allain & Mackey, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2025). She co-authored the 2nd and 3rd editions of the SUNY FACT² Guide to Optimizing AI in Higher Education and co-chairs SUNY FACT² committees on AI for Teaching, Learning, and Accessibility. Her research and creative practice span digital media arts, visual pedagogy, and emerging technologies, exploring how the arts, culture, and innovation intersect to shape reflective and ethical learning in digital environments. Dr. Allain brings a global, interdisciplinary, and multilingual perspective. She is dedicated to empowering learners to engage critically, creatively, and ethically in an evolving technological world.

The online conference takes place on 11th december 2025, 14.00 – 17.45 CET via BigBlueButton: https://meet.gwdg.de/b/joa-fwe-eor-dys.

Online conference in December 2025

On December 11th, 2025 the 7th online conference on “Intercultural perspectives on information literacy and meta literacy” will take place.

Students from Austria, Germany, India, Poland and US will present the results of their research on six topics about the influence of AI in various areas. You can find all information, time slots and the link for participation on the conference poster below:

IPILM project presented at IVEC 2025

The International Virtual Exchange Conference (IVEC) took place from 14th to 17th October 2025, in Heraklion, Greece. The facilitated discussion on

The influence of Artificial intelligence on relational dynamics in Virtual Exchange (VE)

focused on two key questions:

1. How is AI currently used in Virtual Exchange to enhance relational dynamics and support intercultural collaboration?

2. What areas of AI application could further strengthen collaboration, and what ethical considerations must be adressed?

The team leading the session consisted of instructors of two projects which experienced an increased use of AI among participating students to enhance task-based collaboration: Our project Intercultural Perspectives on Information literacy and Metaliteracy (IPILM) and the Global Case Study Challenge.

Participants of the discussion brainstormed AI driven solutions to promote more effective communication and cultural sensitivity and to support conflict resolution while considering ethical challenges, f.e. bias and over reliance on technology. The results should provide a foundation for future research and pratical implementation of AI tools to deepen collaboration in Virtual Exchange endeavors.

You can find the presentation slides here.

Speakers of the session on the IVEC 2025: Joachim Griesbaum, Eithne Knappitsch and Stefan Dreisiebner
Speakers of the session on the IVEC 2025: Joachim Griesbaum, Eithne Knappitsch and Stefan Dreisiebner

IPILM Research paper presented at ECIL 2025

The European Conference on Information Literacy (ECIL) took place from 22nd to 25th September 2025, in Bamberg, Germany. Three instructors from our IPILM Project Team held a presentation on 

„Combining Information Literacy and Metaliteracy to Advance Transnational Group Learning about AI. Learning Process and Learning Outcomes, Results from a Case Study“

About 50 conference participants attended the panel session. The team, consisting of Joachim Griesbaum, Stefan Dreisiebner and Tom Mackey, represented the entire instructor team that collaborated on the conference paper proceedings. They reported results from the IPILM course in winter term 2024/2025 with a focus on how feasible and acceptable the concept is as well as the learning success of the students. The data used for the case study was collected from a pre- and post-course survey. In combination with written reflections from the students and instructors evaluations the educational value of the project was explored.

The findings indicate that the IPILM concept with its unique intercultural learning environment is feasible and worthwhile for its participants. Furthermore, it was laid out that students need substantial learning support. The researchers recommend only highly motivated learners should be given access to such a learning scenario so they could gain the best possible learning experience.

Overall, the results show that the IPILM concept appears to be clear and flexible enough to be applied more widely. Further steps are to refine the concept and expand the project.

Picture: The instructor team at the ECIL 2025 - from left to right: Stefan Dreisiebner, Joachim Griesbaum and Tom Mackey

The long paper will be published in March 2026 with the conference proceedings:

Griesbaum, J., Dreisiebner, S., Adilović, E., Berniak-Woźny, J., Bhattacharya, S., Jacob, J., Mackey, T., & Thadathil, T. (2026): Combining Information Literacy and Metaliteracy to Advance Transnational Group Learning about AI. Learning process and learning outcomes, results from a case study, in: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Information Literacy (ECIL), 22.-25.9.2025, Bamberg, Germany. (in print, to be published in March 2026)

Here you can find the presentation slides.

« Older posts Newer posts »